Skip to main content

    SecureAuth Vs. WorkOS

    Fast to start. Expensive to scale. Shallow by design. WorkOS is genuinely good at abstracting enterprise SSO and SCIM so developer teams can close deals faster. But it's an enterprise-feature abstraction layer, not a B2B identity platform. As your product matures, the gaps become expensive. SecureAuth B2B Authority replaces the stack — not adds to it.

    See the difference

    Use your business email — we'll skip the rest if we already have you on file.

    By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

    "Most WorkOS deployments layer alongside a separate auth provider — two identity vendors, two operational surfaces, growing fragmentation over time. SecureAuth B2B Authority replaces the stack, not adds to it. One platform for SSO, adaptive MFA, fine-grained authorization, delegated tenant management, and agentic identity — with pricing that doesn't penalize you for winning customers."

    Feature Comparison

    See how SecureAuth's unified platform compares to WorkOS's developer-focused B2B SSO toolkit.

    AreaWorkOSSecureAuth
    Platform DNADeveloper-focused B2B SSO toolkit for SaaS apps; expanding into broader authentication but core remains SSO components and directory sync
    Purpose-built for workforce, customer, partner, and AI agent identity — each with dedicated capabilities on a shared governance platform
    B2B Multi-TenancyConnection-based model focused on SSO per customer; no native org hierarchy, sub-orgs, or tenant isolation
    Built-in multi-org with sub-org hierarchies, delegated admin portals, and per-tenant branding and isolation
    SSO & FederationStrong SAML/OIDC support with self-service onboarding; focused on B2B SaaS enterprise SSO
    Dynamic federation with per-tenant IdP configuration, self-service onboarding, consumer and B2B federation, and real-time context passing
    AuthorizationSeparate FGA service (Warrant-based) requiring additional integration work; decoupled from authentication
    Centralized policy engine with RBAC, ABAC, and relationship-based access — unified with authentication and risk
    Adaptive Risk & MFABasic MFA; no native WebAuthn, no advanced adaptive MFA, no risk engine, device fingerprinting, or behavioral analysis
    Adaptive MFA with ML-based risk scoring, device trust, bot detection, and continuous session assurance
    User Journeys & OrchestrationComponent-based approach; custom user journeys require application-level logic and developer implementation
    Visual policy orchestration with extensible hooks, no-code customization, and real-time flow changes
    Consumer Identity (CIAM)Not a focus; expanding into authentication but lacks progressive profiling, consent management, and consumer-scale features
    Native CIAM with adaptive risk, progressive profiling, consent management, and consumer-scale session management
    Workforce IdentityNot a focus; no device trust, desktop login, certificate auth, or workforce MFA policies
    Dedicated Workforce Authority with device trust, passkeys, desktop login, and workforce MFA

    Read the full comparison

    Use your business email — we'll skip the rest if we already have you on file.

    By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy.